Wars are definitely not a good way to end conflict.
Would you like to merge this question into it? MERGE already exists as an alternate of this question. Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?
MERGE exists and is an alternate of. Wars are never a good way to end disagreements between two countries. Politicians disagree, they never have to fight or die in combat.
It is the solders and civilians who get hurt while those who start the conflict sit safely protected.
Was the atomic bomb a good way to end World War 2? They were named Little Boy and Fat Man. Little Boy was dropped on August 6, onto the city of Hiroshima.
Three days later, on August 9, Fat Man was dropped on Nagasaki.
From the bombing only, aroundpeople were killed. Within two to four months around anotherwould die from the effects of the atomic bombings.
Which countries were in conflict during the Cold War? The primary countries did not fight with each otherdirectly -- they made threats and tried to bully.
Russia supplied Cuba with missiles, whichwas too close for USA comfort. It was about the arms race, a race of secrecy toacquire the best, most powerful weapons the quickest.
Kennedy tried to get Russia and Cuba tosee the error of their ways. The Arms race meanteverything to Russia, but the US viewed nuclear weapons as a lastresort threat to the entire human race and to planet Earth. As it continued, The Cold War consisted of various proxy warsfought over a period of several decades from to What is the difference between war and conflict?
A war is a conflict but a conflict is not necessarily a war.
|10 Conflicts to Watch in – Foreign Policy||It is the tool of those who are unable to succeed in diplomacy for whatever reason.|
|Recent Opinions||Allow me to play devil's advocate Wars are a "good" way to end conflicts between countries - it is not correct to wage wars in order to resolve conflicts Post War time periods establish a balance of power creating peace through necessity.|
|Korean War - HISTORY||Would you like to merge this question into it?|
|Returning Users||Wars are definitely not a good way to end conflict.|
A war is an effort to exterminate an opposing side. The two nations were at war with each other.
Throughout her life she warred with sin and corruption. The temptation warred with his conscience. The account of one eyewitness conflicted with that of the other.
My class conflicts with my going to the concert. What country has fought the most conflicts since the end of World War 2? The states that head this list are former colonial powers, and the two Cold War super powers. What are the conflicts between Japan and surrounding countries?
There are no conflicts - Japan and its neighbours are not physically fighting. However, they have disputes.
On a large scale, with North Korea, due to their testing of nuclear warheads - this conflicts with every nation, except North Korea obviously.
Territorial desputes with China and Taiwan over a few islands between the two countries. Territorial desputes with the Philipines over a few islands between the two countries. This lead them to finally successfully invade and colonise then Korea, and then South East Asian countries such as Philipines and Singapore.
What was the conflict between Arabs and Jewish people when World War 1 ended? Before that point, the immigration into the land had been asmall trickle and Arabs were not terribly concerned.% FREE Papers on Whether wars are good way to end conflicts between two countries essays.
Sample topics, paragraph introduction help, research & more. Class , high school & college. wars are the good way to end conflicts because wars show that how powerful a county is and makes other countries to never dare attack this county 5 years ago Side: yes Support Dispute Clarify.
Jun 09, · If there is no way to end a conflict, then war must be entered upon. If a conflict is stupid then I think war should be avoided at all cost, for example, Austria Status: Resolved.
No, wars are not a good way to end conflict between two countries or individual. Wars bring destruction and nothing else. It results in the loss of resources as well as lives.
Wars are not the solution of any conflict.
Mutual understanding and conversation are the basis of better results for any conflict. They would not be my first choice, however, there are times when war is an appropriate means of resolving a conflict. Remember that wars are expensive, they get people killed and countries destroyed.
If there is another way of resolving the conflict, that should be considered first. One war has either led to another war or cold war or war-like circumstances. So wars are not at all a good way to end conflicts between countries or individuals.